Eric Krueger

Good Gossip

3-minute read | last updated 3 weeks, 5 days ago

Fire
Difficult to control and spreads quickly - but unlike fires, not always dangerous.
(photo credit: sippakorn yamkasikorn)

Humans are social creatures, and we receive a lot of information about the world when we gossip - it isn't (necessarily) a bad thing.

Evolution

Gossip is in our blood. Humans who shared information among social circles had an evolutionary advantage. They were able to find those among the group they could trust, and (more importantly) identify bad actors. At the most basic level, gossip was a tool for survival. It answered important questions that helped the group function:

This behavior is called prosocial gossip and protects the group from untrustworthy people. Those uninterested in it were disadvantaged (less likely to mate, reproduce, and form protective alliances). Ultimately, this led to more cooperation in the group.

Encouragement for Cooperation

Gossip serves as a “selfishness deterrent” in a reinforcing, virtuous cycle:

pic

And most of the time, the content is neutral anyway- that is; not inherently positive, or negative. Humans are social creatures, and gossip is a primary mechanism for learning about our world.

Gossip Today

It’s through this evolutionary context and benefit to cooperation that we can identify a standard for “good gossip” in the modern age. It still serves the same purpose: information sharing. What makes it good or bad isn’t the content, but how we use the information. Ultimately, a good gossiper is someone who people trust with information and someone who responsibly uses that information for the benefit of the group. A bad gossiper shares information to get ahead themselves or shares it recklessly.

Think:

My Golden Rule(s)

I have two rules that (generally) serve me well:

  1. You can’t be upset with someone unless they know you’re upset with them.
  2. You can’t say something behind someone’s back unless you’ve said it to their face.

This clears up a lot of issues and reduces the entire volume of gossip-able content. With few exceptions, it’s prudent and productive to first speak directly to anyone you have a problem with. By doing so, you're fostering open communication and trust in your social group (gossip content is often an artifact left behind by miscommunication in the first place). If we accept that a good gossiper is someone you trust, and who is disseminating and using information responsibly; this step could be considered your “due diligence”.

But otherwise: good, bad, or neutral - the virtuosity of gossip isn’t determined by content; only by intention. Warn others about bad actors in your group. Sing the praises of those who deserve it. Enjoy the water cooler talk. In doing so, you'll harness the power of gossip to help yourself and create a stronger, more cohesive community.

--

Enjoyed? Subscribe. Comments? Send me a message.

#communication #word smatter